@article{oai:ous.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000596,
 author = {大城, 光正 and Ohshiro, Terumasa},
 journal = {岡山理科大学紀要, The Bulletin of the Okayama University of Science,},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), This paper aims to investigate the dialectal aspects of the Anatolian languages, which were spoken in Asia Minor in the first and second millennia B. C. On the basis of their dialectal features, it can be shown that they will be divided into two groups : 1) the Hittite group (Hittite, Palaic and Lydian) which is characterized by a-stem nouns, -es pl. nom. ending, -nt participle, and -sk- iterative-suffix and 2) the Luwian group (Luwian, Hieroglyphic Luwian and Lycian) by i-stem nouns, -mo- passive participle, -(a)ssi- adjective suffix and -ss- iterative-suffix. These features indicated, it seems, make up a convincing bundle of isoglosses to divide these languages into two groups. Such is the situation of the fundamentally attested dialectal phase of the Anatolian languages, but, of course, some dialectal elements, which should not be neglected, suggest the possibility of some other dialectal classifications. In Hittite, we can find the most archaic features of the Anatolian languages, such as r/n-stem nouns, the verbal conjugations (mi/hi) and the sentence particles. Palaic has some linguistic traits clearly influenced by Luwian, although it belongs to the Hittite group. In Lydian and in Lycian, various innovations are attested, such as the use of prepositions, the lack of laryngeals and the variation of ^*k^w-. Thus the dialectal investigation of the Anatolian languages must be made more detailed by abstracting and analyzing more effective dialectal characteristics.},
 pages = {123--132},
 title = {アナトリア語派の放言的諸相},
 volume = {15},
 year = {1980},
 yomi = {オオシロ, テルマサ}
}